Abstract: Parents Talk Pot Reactively: Cross-Lagged Panel Models Testing Cannabis Communication and Use (Society for Prevention Research 27th Annual Meeting)

653 Parents Talk Pot Reactively: Cross-Lagged Panel Models Testing Cannabis Communication and Use

Schedule:
Friday, May 31, 2019
Pacific N/O (Hyatt Regency San Francisco)
* noted as presenting author
Nikola Zaharakis, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Wendy Kliewer, PhD, Professor, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Jinni Su, PhD, Postdoctoral Fellow, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Danielle Dick, PhD, Professor, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Cannabis is the most frequently used drug among United States college students and is associated with poor academic outcomes, emotional and psychiatric problems, and impacts on brain development. Limited research has examined the role of parental messages about cannabis, a parenting strategy that often is encouraged to deter use, on cannabis use in emerging adults. The present study investigated the direction of the relation between cannabis-specific parent-offspring communication and cannabis use among college students. We conducted four models to test for the influence of (1) any cannabis use and (2) frequency of cannabis use on (3) overall cannabis communication [modeled as a latent factor] and (4) specific topics of cannabis communication [consequences of use, peer pressure to use, and abstinence from use].

Data were derived from a longitudinal study of college students at a public mid-Atlantic university. This study used a subsample (N=628) recruited in Fall 2012 who completed the junior (Mage = 20.96 years) and senior year surveys. Cross-lagged panel models tested paths from junior year cannabis communication and cannabis use to senior year communication and use, controlling for participants’ age, gender, race, residence, and parental problematic substance use history. Any junior year cannabis use significantly predicted increased senior year cannabis communication (β = 0.168, S.E. = 0.054, p = 0.002), but the opposite path was not significant. More frequent junior year cannabis use predicted more frequent senior year communication (β = 0.164, S.E. = 0.052, p < 0.001). Regarding communication topic, any junior year cannabis use predicted more communication about consequences of use one year later (β = 0.111, S.E. = 0.049, p = 0.024), but not about peer pressure or abstinence. A trend emerged suggesting more frequent junior year cannabis use was related to more frequent communication about consequences of use (β = 0.089, S.E. = 0.052, p = 0.085). Junior year communication about each cannabis topic was unrelated to senior year cannabis use.

Parents with college-enrolled offspring appear to communicate reactively – discussing cannabis after their child has used – instead of proactively communicating to deter use. Results suggest that understanding the timing of parental messages is important to determining their relation to cannabis use. We consider the implications of these results on parent-based substance use interventions for college populations.