Abstract: Addressing Discipline Disparities for Black Male Students: Linking Malleable Root Causes to Feasible and Effective Practices (Society for Prevention Research 27th Annual Meeting)

566 Addressing Discipline Disparities for Black Male Students: Linking Malleable Root Causes to Feasible and Effective Practices

Schedule:
Friday, May 31, 2019
Bayview A (Hyatt Regency San Francisco)
* noted as presenting author
Mylien T. Duong, PhD, Senior Research Scientist, Committee for Children, Seattle, WA
Kent McIntosh, PhD, Professor, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
Aria E Fiat, MA, Doctoral Student, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN
Madeline Larson, MA, Doctoral Student, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN
Michael Pullmann, PhD, Research Associate Professor, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Jenna McGinnis, MA, Doctoral Student, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN
Clayton Cook, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN
Introduction: Schools are under immense pressure to address the overuse of exclusionary disciplinary practices, which remove students from learning opportunities, undermine academic achievement, and negatively impact school climate. These practices disproportionally affect students of colors, particularly Black males. This study used a collaborative approach with administrators from three elementary schools to develop a professional development (PD) program focused on malleable root causes of discipline disproportionality: (a) proactive classroom management strategies to prevent problem behavior; (b) recognition and regulation of implicit bias; and (c) effective reactive strategies to respond to perceived or actual student problem behaviors in an empathic, consistent, and appropriate way.

Methods: All certified staff in three urban elementary schools participated in the study. To ensure that all staff in the schools received the PD, a single case experimental concurrent multiple baseline design was used. The training consisted of two 3-hour sessions that provided rationale, introduced concrete skills, and provided opportunity for skills practice for proactive classroom management, regulating implicit bias, and effective reactive strategies. Post-training implementation supports included (1) weekly coaching, (2) biweekly Professional Learning Communities, and (3) daily reminder e-mails. Data about office discipline referrals (ODRs) were collected using the School-Wide Information System. Relative risk ratios were calculated to determine the probability of Black male students, compared to all other students, being referred to the office before and after the PD.

Results: Compared to baseline averages, ODRs for all students were reduced by half post-implementation across all three schools. In additional, visual analysis and single case effect size estimates from the multiple baseline design graphs showed that the PD was effective at reducing ODR relative risk ratios for black male students across all three schools (Δs = 1.5, 2.9, 6.2). Although visible and meaningful reductions in relative risk ratios were found, the three schools continued to demonstrate disproportionality in ODRs (i.e., risk ratios > 1.0) post-PD.

Conclusions: The PD shows potential promise for reducing discipline referrals overall and discipline disproportionality specifically. However, this study’s findings need to be considered in the context of the participating schools’ existing implementation efforts. At the time of the study, all schools were actively involved in implementing School Wide- Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports, as well as racial equity work that involved exploring privilege, the impact of cultural mismatch, and helping educators adopt a lens of equity.