Abstract: Impact of Parental Notification Following a University Student Substance Use Violation (Society for Prevention Research 26th Annual Meeting)

79 Impact of Parental Notification Following a University Student Substance Use Violation

Schedule:
Tuesday, May 29, 2018
Columbia A/B (Hyatt Regency Washington, Washington, DC)
* noted as presenting author
Matthew F. Bumpus, PhD, Associate Professor, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Laura Hill, PhD, Professor and Chair, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Brittany Cooper, PhD, Assistant Professor, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Eleanor Dizon, MA, Graduate Student, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Introduction: Parental notification following a student substance use violation is a common strategy for university administrators, and is commonly assumed to play a role in reducing student substance use and misuse. However, the empirical literature on parental notification is limited to only a handful of studies, each with serious methodological problems. Here we present results from the first randomized controlled trial of parent notification, in which we partnered with a university student conduct office to randomly assign students to either a parent letter condition or a no parent letter condition upon committing a violation. Specifically, we examine student alcohol and marijuana use for possible treatment effects, as well as parent-student relationship characteristics as potential moderators.

Method: University students were randomly assigned by university student conduct office personnel to conditions upon receiving an alcohol or substance use violation over the course of the 2016-17 academic year. Approximately six weeks after the violation, students (n=389) completed surveys assessing parent-student communication, parent-student relationship quality, and alcohol/substance use.

Results: A series of mixed-model ANOVAs revealed several associations that differed as a function of letter group status and parent-student relationship quality. Students whose parents who received a letter, and who viewed their parents as highly controlling, reported higher rates of parent-initiated conversations in response to the violation; highly controlling parents were also viewed by students as more concerned about the violation. However, students with highly controlling parents who received a letter viewed those conversations as less helpful than did other students.

With regard to alcohol and substance use, interactions emerged: students whose parents received a letter and reported high parental control indicated lower rates of 30-day alcohol use and 30-day marijuana use than did other students, but were less likely than other students to perceive a need to cut back on their drinking.

Conclusions: These results suggest that the impact of parental notification is mixed: for students whose parents were perceived as highly controlling and received a parent letter, there appears to be a short-term decrease in drinking and marijuana use, but in combination with a lower perception of need to cut back on drinking. This pattern is consistent with the idea that high-control parenting may yield short-term, reactive behavior changes.