Abstract: Examining Reliability and Validity of a Subjective Adolescent SES Measure (Society for Prevention Research 26th Annual Meeting)

397 Examining Reliability and Validity of a Subjective Adolescent SES Measure

Schedule:
Thursday, May 31, 2018
Columbia A/B (Hyatt Regency Washington, Washington, DC)
* noted as presenting author
Mark Hammond, MPH, Doctoral student, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
Atika Khurana, PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
Elizabeth Stormshak, PhD, Professor, Director Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
Introduction: Socioeconomic status (SES) is a robust predictor of health outcomes in adolescence and later adulthood, yet obtaining accurate and reliable measurement of SES remains a significant challenge. This is in part due to adolescents' lack of knowledge about their parents SES. We use a subjective SES measure that assesses adolescent perceptions of economic resources (PER) of their family (i.e., “how much money does your family have?” - not enough to get by, just enough to get by etc.) and evaluate its reliability over time in relation to other commonly used measures of parental/family SES, as well as its predictive validity in relation to alcohol use – a common risk behavior during adolescence and young adulthood.

Methods: Longitudinal data from 593 parent-child dyads assessed in middle school (6th-7th grade) and in young adulthood (19-23 years) were analyzed using factor analysis and regression models. Adolescent reports of parental education and PER, and parental reports of their education and family income were obtained in middle-school (baseline). Self-reports of alcohol use were obtained at baseline (Mage = 15.1 years) and young adulthood (Mage = 21.5 years).

Results: Adolescent PER was significantly correlated with adolescent reports of parental education (r’s = 0.26 – 0.32) and loaded on a single factor with these SES indicators (loadings = 0.36 – 0.44). Adolescent reports of parental education and parents’ own reports of education were more strongly correlated (r = 0.58 – 0.66) than associations between adolescent PER and parental reports of family income (r = 0.41). Controlling for demographics, alcohol use in middle school was significantly predicted by adolescent reports of parental education, B(SE) = -0.25(0.12), p <0.05, but not by adolescent PER, B(SE) = 0.21(0.19), p = 0.26. Young adult drinking was independently predicted by both parental education, B(SE) = 0.64(0.24), p <0.01 and PER, B(SE) = 1.25(0.46), p <0.01.

Conclusion: Adolescent PER can be a useful indicator of family SES, in addition to parental education. PER demonstrated convergent validity with other common SES indicators across time and predictive validity in relation to a common health risk behavior of alcohol use during young adulthood. Although PER was not predictive of drinking behaviors during adolescence, this may be because early-onset drinking (in 6th-7th grade) was less prevalent in our sample (<5%). Future research should evaluate predictive validity of adolescent PER using larger sample sizes and latent factors with multiple subjective SES indicators.