The goal of this study is to explore the moderation effect of clique popularity on the link between centrality and adolescent self-esteem over a one-year period. We controlled for age, sex, individual popularity and self-esteem at baseline.
METHOD: 470 adolescents (54% girls, mean age 13 years) in the 1st and 2nd years of a secondary school in Belgium were assessed twice, one year apart. A French version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (1965) assessed self-esteem (10 items, α = .81). Friendships among participants were identified through reciprocal nominations to the question “Who do you like the most among your grade mates?” Cliques were identified using the algorithm Girvan-Newman of UCINET 6 (Borgatti et al., 2014). A centrality score was computed for each clique member using UCINET 6. Most-popular and least-popular peer nominations to the question “Who are the most and the least popular among your grade mates?” were combined to assess participants’ popularity. Clique popularity was computed from the average of clique members’ popularity scores. However, this calculus excluded the target participant. Centrality and clique popularity scores were dichotomized using minus one standard deviation as a threshold, in order to isolate peripheral members and unpopular cliques.
RESULTS: Moderation analysis on Mplus 7.0 showed that centrality positively predicted self-esteem over time (β = .35, p < .01) and that clique popularity negatively moderated this link (β = -.47, p < .01). Further analysis showed that only peripheral teenagers within unpopular cliques were likely to experiencing a decrease in self-esteem over one year.
CONCLUSION: These findings highlight that peripheral teenagers of an unpopular clique are at particular risks of experiencing low self-esteem over time. This indicates that prevention efforts should target this category of youth in order to cope for the negative influence of this at-risk social context on their self-esteem.