Methods: Data came from 11 separate, randomized, college alcohol intervention trials that collected data on marijuana frequency at baseline and follow up (N=7639). Three of the eleven interventions also focused on drugs. We used t-tests (for continuous measures) and Wilcoxon's Two Sample tests (for ordinal measures) to examine intervention versus control group differences in marijuana use frequency at both short-term (1-3 months post intervention) and long-term (6-12 months) follow ups. In addition, to examine within-group changes in marijuana use, we utilized paired t-tests and Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests.
Results: Across studies, there were no significant differences between intervention and control groups in short-term marijuana effects and only one significant long-term effect indicating that the control group exhibited a lower frequency of marijuana use than the intervention group. However, within-group analyses showed that intervention groups were twice as likely as control groups to experience significant reductions in marijuana use, regardless of whether the intervention specifically targeted drug use. Within studies, students were divided by thirds into those who reduced their alcohol use, those who remained the same, and those who increased. For the most part, those students who reduced their drinking were more likely to decrease their marijuana use, whereas those who increased their drinking were more likely to increase their marijuana use, especially over the long term.
Conclusions: It appears that interventions that reduce alcohol use may be beneficial also for reducing marijuana use. There is still a need, however, to develop and test new interventions for college students that focus specifically on marijuana use.