Methods: The RVSPP uses CBPR methods to support a multi-directional learning partnership to advance research, policy, and practice. We are applying mixed qualitative and quantitative methods to capture community-level change in capacity, social networks, suicide risk and protective factors, and suicide outcomes. We are also assessing implementation to support continuous quality improvement of both program administration and community implementation.
Results: This study is currently underway. Preliminary results indicate a high degree of feasibility and acceptability of the intervention model. Additionally, community partners’ input has been central to advancing our understanding how to implement rural Veterans suicide prevention. For example, early qualitative evidence has led us to think critically about the ways in which public stigma of suicide can be a barrier to effective community action and partnerships.
Conclusions: RVSPP represents a research-policy-practice partnership. Suicide prevention researchers developed the program model and identified best practice resources to support implementation in collaboration with rural communities. Evidence from the evaluation is being fed back into the program to enhance VHA policy and guide new directions for research. To date, this feedback has helped us identify innovative new services to increase access to care, led us to revise our community assessment and planning processes, and led to stronger community-based and culturally appropriate prevention strategies.