Abstract: Multiple Meta-Analytic Strategies to Identify Essential Components of Preventive Interventions: Findings from the Parenting Field (Society for Prevention Research 26th Annual Meeting)

466 Multiple Meta-Analytic Strategies to Identify Essential Components of Preventive Interventions: Findings from the Parenting Field

Schedule:
Friday, June 1, 2018
Columbia C (Hyatt Regency Washington, Washington, DC)
* noted as presenting author
Frances Gardner, PhD, Professor, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Patty Leijten, PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
G.J. Melendez-Torres, PhD RN MFPH FHEA, Senior Lecturer, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Jamie Lachman, DPhil, Research Associate, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Wendy Knerr, MA, Research officer, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Chris Mikton, PhD, Senior Researcher, University of West England, Bristol, United Kingdom
Judy Hutchings, PhD, Professor, Bangor University, Gwynedd, Wales
Most preventive interventions deliver a complex package of skills, but rarely is it clear which of many components are necessary or effective. Elucidating essential components could help optimize programs so that they are briefer, more effective and efficient.

This novel study employs multiple approaches for elucidating essential components of parenting interventions. Enhancing these interventions is vital, as they are prominent in both US and global policy recommendations for preventing violence to children, and child behavior disorders. This has resulted in widespread implementation efforts in low-resource settings (eg WHO, CDC, UNICEF, UNODC), where effectiveness, cost, scalability and sustainability are of paramount importance.

We systematically reviewed the literature for studies providing evidence from each of 4 methods we identified to test effective components of parenting interventions: 1: Meta-regression of associations between intervention components and outcomes (Kaminski et al, 2006); 2: Multi-arm dismantling trials, 3: Microtrials, i.e. focused randomized experiments (Howe et al, 2013) 4: Optimization studies, eg factorial designs. We found sufficient good quality trials for strategies 1 & 3, namely meta-regression and meta-analysis of microtrials - strategies with complementary strengths and weaknesses, in terms of causal inference vs. external validity.

Meta-regression using robust variance estimation (156 RCTs; 386 effect sizes) tested if components aimed at enhancing the parent-child relationship (e.g. child directed play), and those aimed at behavior management (e.g. praise, rewards, timeout) predict greater reductions in disruptive child behaviour. Overall, we found that adding relationship components to behavior management yielded stronger effects treatment trials, but not in prevention trials (111 vs 45 RCTs respectively). Findings from meta-analysis of microtrials (20 RCTs; 78 effect sizes) partly concurred in finding that behavior management components were more strongly associated with child outcomes, however this applied only to ‘timeout’ and ‘ignore’, rather than positive discipline strategies, such as praise.

Findings show we have more limited knowledge of essential components of preventive parenting interventions, raising the possibility that current practice to implement essentially the same parenting programs in treatment and prevention settings may be unwarranted. We discuss implications of these component analysis findings for practice and for understanding prevention mechanisms – findings which in many ways diverge from well-established practice; and implications for research, especially the need for factorial trials to maximise both external and internal validity.