We took adapted scale items and fit a measurement model, aligned with Ritscher, Otilingam, and Grajales’ (2003) assignment of sub-scales. Fit indices suggested a reasonable fit of the model. However, because of a high correlation of one of sub-scales, stereotype endorsement, with the other sub-scales, we combined the stereotype endorsement sub-scale with the sub-scale capturing perceived discrimination. Implications and specific findings will be discussed with regard to utilizing this and other measures of contextual experiences relating to trauma-born statuses with women, widows, and international samples.
The results of the confirmatory factor analysis with the sub-scales of social withdrawal, alienation, and perceived discrimination and stereotype endorsement suggested a reasonably well fitting model (X2 = 150.85, df = 62, p < .001, RMSEA = .064, CFI = .901, TLI =.876). The factor loadings were all significant and relatively strong (<.5 in all cases but 1). The three latent constructs were highly correlated (<.6). In addition, the stigma of widowhood (taken as a whole scale) correlated significantly and moderately with depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress symptoms such that higher distress correlated with higher levels of stigma.
The importance of this study lies in the clarifying of cross-cultural measurement of a key way in which a social location like widowhood has an impact the lives of those occupying it: stigma. In order to understand how widowed populations throughout the world (a growing group in response to war and illness) experience life and distress, we need clear measures commenting not only on psychological distress but role related distress that speaks directly to social context, privilege and resources.