Methods: 1503 MS and 1995 HS students from 46 schools on or near reservations completed substance use surveys during the 2009-2013 school years. Potential latent class predictors included peer use, substance availability, perceived harm, family attitudes toward use, family communication about use, high risk substance behaviors, and early initiation. Predictor variables were included as auxiliary variables in four-class models as identified by Stanley and Swaim (2017). A 3-step approach was used to assess each auxiliary variable as described by Vermont (2010). For both age groups, the three substance-using classes were compared to the non-user class.
Results: Four latent class of use were identified: 1) nonusers, 2) marijuana & cigarettes, 3) alcohol, marijuana, & cigarettes, and 4) polysubstance users. Predictors differentiated between substance-using and nonuser class membership, but some were better predictors than others, and differences were found across grade level. Among MS students, the best predictors of user status were peer alcohol use, using substances when alone, and early initiation of alcohol and marijuana. Substance availability, family attitudes toward use, and family communication about use did not predict class membership. Among HS students, peer alcohol and marijuana use, substance availability, perceived harm of alcohol use, family attitudes toward use, using substances when alone, and early initiation of alcohol were the best predictors of user status.
Conclusions: While similar latent classes of substance use were found across MS and HS American Indian students, there was variation in the types of predictors that differentiated user and nonuser status. While peer use, using alone, and early initiation were predictive for both groups, lack of perceived availability, perceived harm, and family sanctions against use were protective against using among HS students. MS AI students establish substance-using groups similar to their HS peers, but differing predictors suggest that family attitudes and perceived harm may be important targets for prevention efforts to avert use among HS-age youth in this group.