Project directors in the subrecipient communities described the interventions they implemented on a web-based Community Level Instrument twice each year. This instrument allowed the project directors to categorize their interventions by service type, SAMHSA strategy type, IOM category, ecological intervention target, evidence-base, and population sub-group targets. The analyses focus on intervention implemented by subrecipients in the federal fiscal years of 2015 and 2016.
Results showed that on average community subrecipients implemented 3.9 intervention-service type activities, about 37% of which were information dissemination activities and 26% environmental strategies. About half of the interventions targeted whole communities, with only 18% targeting individual young people and 11% targeting families. Media campaigns are the most often implemented types of interventions. Project directors defined just over half of interventions as evidence-based programs, policies, or practices (EBPs), most because they appeared on a list provided by their state-level grantee or alternatively on a federal registry.
This session presentation will highlight the evidence-base that communities use to select their interventions and where gaps may exist in the research base for interventions that address community needs. This presentation will conclude with a discussion of why PFS communities focus more on community targeted activities, and where gaps in the EBPs available for prescription drug misuse lead community subrecipients to select non-EBP environmental strategies and media campaigns.