Abstract: Validating Computer-Based Methods for Assessing Quality in Parent-Training Behavioral Interventions (Society for Prevention Research 25th Annual Meeting)

543 Validating Computer-Based Methods for Assessing Quality in Parent-Training Behavioral Interventions

Schedule:
Friday, June 2, 2017
Lexington (Hyatt Regency Washington, Washington DC)
* noted as presenting author
Carlos G. Gallo, PhD, Research Assistant Professor, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
Cady Berkel, PhD, Assistant Research Professor, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Anne Marie Mauricio, PhD, Assistant Research Professor, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Irwin N. Sandler, PhD, Regents' Professor, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
C. Hendricks Brown, PhD, Professor, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
Introduction: The gold star standard for monitoring implementation of evidence-based programs (EBPs) include behavioral observations by independent observers. These assessments are labor-intensive and create a major bottleneck in the monitoring of implementation and providing feedback necessary for quality improvement. We present the development of computer-based methods for implementation quality measurement. Our goal is to develop efficient and valid methods that reduce the burden of quality monitoring, and provide timely feedback for delivery supervisors.

Methods: Our data consists of transcripts and human-based ratings of 470 sessions of the New Beginning Program (NBP) for divorcing parents from an effectiveness trial. First, we used a machine classifier that uses Support Vector Machine algorithm to classify between high-quality versus low-quality (defined by human coders) sessions. The classifier was trained on a corpus of two dimensions of quality namely when the intervention group leader a) Provided helpful examples to parents, b) Indicated belief in parent’s ability to use the skills well. Second, we tested the validity of the machine-based ratings following our theoretical model which posits that when sessions are delivered with quality, parents will be more likely to engage in the program and attend the following session.

Results: The machine-based rater correctly classifies 94% of sessions into either low or high quality sessions. We present the linguistic patterns in terms of word frequencies that helped the algorithm identify low and high quality. We present quantitative assessments of predictive validity of the machine-based ratings with parents’ retention and skills practice.

Conclusions: This study presents preliminary evidence that 1) there are linguistic features readily available for automatic recognition of quality, and 2) machine-based methods can be used to monitor implementation in community settings. This will have significant implications for ensuring that EBPs are able to achieve public health impact.