Methods: This study used a two-week daily diary design to compare days in which AmEDs were used (“AmED days”) and days where other types of alcohol were used (“non-AmED days”) on where, when, and with whom drinking occurred. Participants were 122 (90 women) heavy drinking college students who reported mixing caffeine with alcohol at least once in the past week. The majority were Caucasian (54.9%) and seniors (32.8%). Mean age was 20.39 (SD = 2.08) years old. Data were collected across 389 drinking days; 40 of these days involved AmEDs.
Results: Multilevel modeling revealed that odds of drinking at a bar or club were higher on AmED days relative to non-AmED days, OR = 3.26, CI = 1.52 – 7.01, but similar across other locations. In addition, odds of pre-gaming were higher on AmED days as compared to non-AmED days, OR = 3.93, CI = 1.70 – 9.11. AmED use was unrelated to drinking game behavior, OR = 0.38, CI = 0.10 – 1.53. Odds of drinking with others as opposed to drinking alone were higher on AmED days, OR = 3.80, CI = 1.19 – 12.14.
Discussion: Overall, AmEDs are consumed socially and in potentially risky contexts. In combination with prior findings that AmED days are linked with heavier alcohol use and more harms, these findings support the unique nature of AmED use in predicting or maintaining potentially hazardous drinking patterns. The findings may aid in prevention efforts for AmED users. Information about the potential for risk related to drinking AmEDs could be incorporated in existing brief motivational interventions that deliver personalized feedback on drinking habits. Our findings suggest AmEDs are consumed in bars and clubs, while pre-gaming, and with other people. These contexts may be key topics in AmED-tailored intervention work. Because drinking in these environments is uniquely linked with poorer outcomes, users should be informed of their risk for experiencing harms not only by drinking AmEDs but also by drinking AmEDs in these known risky contexts.