Abstract: Equal Chances for Children Affected By Maternal Incarceration? the Sustained Effect of Parent Training for Mothers Being Released from Incarceration on Child Antisocial Behavior, Parenting and Parenting Stress, and the Mediating Role of Parenting (Society for Prevention Research 24th Annual Meeting)

125 Equal Chances for Children Affected By Maternal Incarceration? the Sustained Effect of Parent Training for Mothers Being Released from Incarceration on Child Antisocial Behavior, Parenting and Parenting Stress, and the Mediating Role of Parenting

Schedule:
Wednesday, June 1, 2016
Garden Room B (Hyatt Regency San Francisco)
* noted as presenting author
Ankie T. A. Menting, PhD, Postdoctoral researcher, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Sophie C. Alsem, BSc, Research Master's student, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Bram Orobio de Castro, PhD, Full professor, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Walter Matthys, MD, Professor, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Introduction: Children of incarcerated mothers are considered one of the most at-risk populations for behavior problems and later delinquency. Parenting may play a key role in this, as these mothers evidence less optimal parenting behaviors and high levels of parenting stress. Therefore, selective prevention – using parent training – seems obvious to break the intergenerational cycle of crime. Indeed, our earlier research revealed substantial short-term effects of intervention on children’s antisocial behavior and maternal parenting behavior. However, it is unclear whether these effects sustain, especially as intervention was offered during a stressful period which might influence learning/sustaining parenting behaviors. Furthermore, effects on parenting stress and the mediating role of parenting behavior have never been studied in this high-risk population before. This study examines the follow-up effect of enhanced Incredible Years parent training, for (formerly) incarcerated mothers, on parenting behavior, parenting stress and children’s antisocial behavior, and if parenting behavior mediates both the intervention effect and the effect of parenting stress on antisocial behavior.

Methods: Nationwide screening resulted in 129 (formerly) incarcerated mothers with children (age 2-10), of which 87.6% chose to participate. After randomization, 91 mothers with 133 children were included in intention-to-treat analyses. Reliable change index scores were obtained to examine change (increase/stability/decrease) in antisocial behavior (ECBI), parenting behavior (APQ), and parenting stress (NOSIK) for every child. To examine the form of change over time and its dependence on the intervention, three latent growth curve models (LGCM; parenting behavior, parenting stress, antisocial behavior) were conducted in Mplus, controlling for multilevel structure. Additionally, multigroup LGCM analyses were utilized to examine between-group differences, and a multigroup four-wave cross-lagged panel model to examine the mediating role of parenting behavior.

Results: A significant intervention effect on maternal parenting was found at follow-up. When examining change, analyses revealed significant decreases in child antisocial behavior and parenting stress for the combined group of intervention mothers and mothers who never attended the intervention (but were invited). Both of the examined parenting behaviors mediated between the intervention effect and antisocial behavior, while one of these behaviors mediated between parenting stress and antisocial behavior.

Conclusions: The results of our study show that short-term effects partially sustain at follow-up, and confirm the key role of parenting behaviors in this at-risk population. We discuss implications and importance of current and future assessments of antisocial behavior (including registered offences) to examine whether this program may help breaking the intergenerational cycle of crime.