Integrating a Dynamic Risk Factor Model into Policies for Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking Prevention

Introduction: Although domestic minor sex trafficking has gained national attention, many professionals remain unaware of what to do if a victim is encountered. In response to the gap in practical intervention knowledge, three models were created based on results of a quantitative survey of 115 trafficked youth. The models provide basic guides for professionals to identify intervene and deliver treatment to trafficked and at-risk youth. While it may be costly for all professionals to obtain in-depth training on domestic minor sex trafficking, these models can be implemented with minimal training requirements and do not involve extensive specialization. In addition, the models cut across disciplines and can be utilized by a variety of professions.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was employed across five cities in one Midwestern state. Respondents were recruited through respondent driven sampling. Data collectors were required to know at least two individuals currently involved in the commercial sex industry. Individuals over the age of 16 that reported involvement in the commercial sex industry in the past year were eligible to complete the survey. The initial seeds completed the survey, were compensated, and received five coupons to provide to their peers in the industry. Peers who took the survey were compensated and received five coupons and so on to provide access to social networks. 

Results: Results from the five city risk factor study were used to create dynamic models to identify and intervene with victims of domestic minor sex trafficking. The RESCUE CHILD model is a tool for immediate assessment and intervention for first responders to identify victims of trafficking and also youth at-risk for trafficking. The model synthesizes the identified risk factors from the sample of 115 and allows professionals to easily assess if intervention is needed. Once intervention has been assessed the DIVERT and ABCD models are implemented. The DIVERT model provides recommendations for immediate intervention giving the professional tools in interacting with the youth and also action steps. Finally the ABCD model includes steps for service provision. These models fill current gaps in identifying and intervening with trafficked youth and have the capacity for implementation under a range of specializations and disciplines.

Conclusions: Professionals need practical tools that can be easily implemented into diverse workplaces. The RESCUE CHILD, DIVERT and ABCD models provide professionals the necessary tools to assess, intervene and plan treatment for trafficked youth with minimal training requirements.