In this paper we examine the extent to which RULER impacts the relationship between teacher perceptions of school climate and teacher stress and burn out using data from a randomized control trial of RULER in 64 schools. In our sample, we examine the perceptions and performance of 84 teachers (evenly divided across the RULER and control conditions). We use longitudinal data from across two academic years of intervention, controlling for perceptions and outcomes during the academic year prior to the intervention. In our analyses, a teacher perception of school climate is a composite score comprised of four scales: Support for Instructional Improvement, Staff Collegiality, Administrative Leadership and Administrator Support. For teacher stress and burn out, we examined two sub scales, Emotional Exhaustion and Personal Accomplishment, each of which was modeled separately as an outcome in the path analyses. We estimated multigroup (control v. RULER) path models using LISREL 9.10 and model fit was examined using multiple indices, including the root mean square error of approximations (RMSEA, values of <.06) along with the change in chi square across varying nested model.
Results suggest teachers participating in the RULER program had increased perceptions of school climate, decreased emotional exhaustion and increased personal accomplishment at the end of the two-year intervention period. The discussion focuses on the potential for school-level interventions to impact individual teacher outcomes.