Abstract: Effects of School-Based Mindfulness and Yoga on Self-Regulation in Urban Youth: Challenges and Opportunities (Society for Prevention Research 23rd Annual Meeting)

463 Effects of School-Based Mindfulness and Yoga on Self-Regulation in Urban Youth: Challenges and Opportunities

Schedule:
Friday, May 29, 2015
Regency D (Hyatt Regency Washington)
* noted as presenting author
Tamar Mendelson, PhD, Associate Professor, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
Jacinda K. Dariotis, PhD, MAS, MS, MA, Assistant Professor, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
Laura Feagans Gould, PhD, Director of Research and Evaluation, Minds, Inc., Washington, DC
Alexis R. Harris, PhD, Research Assistant Professor of Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Mark T. Greenberg, PhD, Edna Peterson Bennett Endowed Chair in Prevention Research, Professor of Human Development and Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Background: Exposure to chronic stress and trauma is a public health problem in the U.S., particularly for youth growing up in disadvantaged urban areas. Problems with cognitive and emotion regulation stemming from stress and trauma exposure is a critical factor contributing to the high prevalence of social, emotional, and academic problems among these vulnerable young people. Emerging evidence suggests that mindfulness-based practices may be helpful for urban youth. In an earlier randomized pilot trial, our team found that a mindfulness and yoga intervention improved self regulation in response to stress among urban middle school students. Building on that work, we conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the impact of the intervention for a larger sample of 5th and 6th grade students attending urban public schools.

Design/Methods: We recruited 251 5th and 6th grade students across six urban schools serving disadvantaged urban communities. Three schools were assigned to receive the 16-week mindfulness and yoga program twice per week; students at the other three schools received standard programming. We evaluated self-reported self-regulation at baseline and post-test. We also conducted focus groups with selected intervention participants.

Results: In contrast to our pilot trail, we did not find a significant difference between the control and intervention students with respect to self-reported self regulation in response to stress. Qualitative data, however, suggest that some youth may have found the program helpful for learning to manage anger and other difficult emotions.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the complexities in researching school-based mindfulness-based interventions, which include questions regarding intervention dose, measurement of outcomes, and implementation issues. Findings are discussed with reference to key questions and next steps in the field.