Abstract: Using Implementation Theory to Explain Variation in Delivery of a Complex Social Intervention: Process Evaluation of the Strengthening Families Programme (10-14UK) in Wales UK (Society for Prevention Research 23rd Annual Meeting)

508 Using Implementation Theory to Explain Variation in Delivery of a Complex Social Intervention: Process Evaluation of the Strengthening Families Programme (10-14UK) in Wales UK

Schedule:
Friday, May 29, 2015
Lexington (Hyatt Regency Washington)
* noted as presenting author
Jeremy Segrott, PhD, Research Fellow in Public Health, DECIPHer Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Heather Rothwell, MSc, Research Associate, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Jonathan B. Scourfield, PhD, Professor, Decipher, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
David Foxcroft, PhD, Professor of Community Psychology and Public Health, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
Jo C. Holliday, PhD, Research Fellow, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Kerry Hood, PhD, Director, South East Wales Trials Unit, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Ceri Phillips, PhD, Professor of Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
Zoe Roberts, PhD, Lecturer, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Sarah Morgan-Trimmer, PhD, Research Associate, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Hayley Reed, BSc, Involving Young People Officer, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
David Gillespie, BSc, Statistician, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Claire Hurlow, MSc, Trial Manager, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Laurence Moore, PhD, Professor / Director, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Simon Murphy, PhD, Reader, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Studies of the Strengthening Families Program (SFP10-14) universal substance-misuse prevention intervention in the United States have produced evidence of effectiveness but say little about implementation processes.  This paper presents findings from the mixed-methods process evaluation of a trial of SFP in Wales (Project SFP10-14UK) during 2010-2012, investigating fidelity and how it was influenced by local contexts.

Structured observation; reports from SFP facilitators; and routine monitoring data assessed the extent to which SFP10-14UK was implemented as intended.  Semi-structured interviews with implementers elicited their perceptions of SFP and implementation processes. Qualitative data were coded using a thematic framework.  Quantitative and qualitative data were used together to examine reasons for variation in fidelity across research sites.  Results were interpreted using the four constructs of the General Theory of Implementation.

Fifty-six programmes were delivered across 7 research sites to 218 families with children aged 10-14 (60% of 361 in the intervention group).  National training and positive attitudes of local staff achieved high coverage rates; targets for staffing; and provision of free travel, refreshments and child care. Staffing standards were easier to attain when staff were employed by the same organisation.  Targets for group size and composition were met less frequently due to challenges in participant recruitment.  Reduced capacity in public-sector organisations during an economic recession (2010-2012) aggravated difficulties in recruiting staff and participant families. 

While coverage rates and staffing reached high standards of fidelity, requirements for group size and composition were less often met.  Mixed methods provided insights into staff and participant recruitment; and the utility of General Implementation Theory in a pragmatic study of a complex intervention was demonstrated.


David Foxcroft
Diageo: Institution has received funding from the alcohol industry for programme development