Methods: We propose model-based county-level estimates using the following methodology. We used stepwise linear regression to develop an initial model for the estimated variables, using county-level auxiliary data on measures including education and income, and state-level data on smoking bans and tobacco control funding. We applied an arcsine-transformation to the variables to stabilize the variance, and implemented a state-level design effect to account for clustering. Our regression estimates are then input to a Fay-Herriot small-area model, which we extend to a Bayesian framework through a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation.
Results: Our small-area models generated a new set of estimates with improved precision over the survey-based estimates. Three measures were computed to assess the goodness of fit, and those measures show that the Fay-Herriot model fits the data well for all the different outcomes. We also demonstrate the accuracy of our model through data exhibits.
Conclusions: These techniques represent an effective means of generating estimates where there is small (or zero) county sample. Small-area modeling shows improvement over a design-based methodology and provides a better guideline for directing prevention funding. At present, we are extending our model to more recent years and will release the current data through NCI.