Abstract: Small Area Estimation for the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (Society for Prevention Research 22nd Annual Meeting)

303 Small Area Estimation for the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey

Schedule:
Thursday, May 29, 2014
Congressional C (Hyatt Regency Washington)
* noted as presenting author
Aaron J. Gilary, MA, Mathematical Statistician, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC
Benmei Liu, PhD, Mathematical Statistician, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, MD
Introduction: The Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS), conducted by the Census Bureau and sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), is a key source of national and state-level data on smoking and other tobacco use in the U.S. household population. However, policy makers and cancer researchers often need county-level data to evaluate tobacco control programs, and the TUS-CPS does not have enough sample at the county level to support estimates with adequate precision. In such case, estimates derived through small-area estimation (SAE) techniques may be preferred. Through a collaboration between the Census Bureau and NCI, we present research on estimating several different smoking-related variables (e.g., rate of people currently smoking, rate of people formerly smoking, rate of workplace smoking bans) for all U.S. counties.

Methods: We propose model-based county-level estimates using the following methodology. We used stepwise linear regression to develop an initial model for the estimated variables, using county-level auxiliary data on measures including education and income, and state-level data on smoking bans and tobacco control funding. We applied an arcsine-transformation to the variables to stabilize the variance, and implemented a state-level design effect to account for clustering. Our regression estimates are then input to a Fay-Herriot small-area model, which we extend to a Bayesian framework through a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation.

Results:  Our small-area models generated a new set of estimates with improved precision over the survey-based estimates. Three measures were computed to assess the goodness of fit, and those measures show that the Fay-Herriot model fits the data well for all the different outcomes. We also demonstrate the accuracy of our model through data exhibits.

Conclusions:  These techniques represent an effective means of generating estimates where there is small (or zero) county sample. Small-area modeling shows improvement over a design-based methodology and provides a better guideline for directing prevention funding. At present, we are extending our model to more recent years and will release the current data through NCI.