Abstract: Programme Fidelity in a Large Pragmatic Trial: Findings from a Process Evaluation of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 UK (SFP10-14UK) (Society for Prevention Research 22nd Annual Meeting)

7 Programme Fidelity in a Large Pragmatic Trial: Findings from a Process Evaluation of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 UK (SFP10-14UK)

Schedule:
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
Columbia A/B (Hyatt Regency Washington)
* noted as presenting author
Jeremy Segrott, PhD, Research Fellow in Public Health, DECIPHer Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Heather Rothwell, MSc, Research Associate, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Simon Murphy, PhD, Reader, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Sarah Morgan-Trimmer, PhD, Research Associate, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Jonathan B. Scourfield, PhD, Professor, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Jo C. Holliday, PhD, Research Fellow, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Claire Thomas, MSc, Trial Manager, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Zoe Roberts, PhD, Lecturer, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
David Gillespie, MSc, Statistician, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Laurence Moore, PhD, Professor of Public Health Improvement, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
David Foxcroft, PhD, Professor of Community Psychology and Public Health, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
Kerry Hood, PhD, Director, South East Wales Trials Unit, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Ceri Phillips, PhD, Professor of Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
Hayley Reed, BSc, Involving Young People Officer, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Ioan Humphries, MSc, Research Officer, Cardiff University, Swansea, United Kingdom
Background: Fidelity evaluation is particularly important in pragmatic studies, which afford greater potential for variation than explanatory trials.  The Project SFP Cymru process evaluation has examined adherence, exposure, quality of delivery, participant engagement and programme differentiation during a randomised controlled trial of the Strengthening Families Programme (SFP10-14UK) involving more than 700 families.  SFP10-14UK was delivered by local voluntary and statutory bodies in seven areas of Wales.  Training, funding and programme manuals were provided as they would be in a non-research context and there were no special measures to control programme delivery.

Methods: Data collection comprised: thirty-three interviews with and self-report data from programme staff; observation of programme sessions; and routine data from each area.  Descriptive analyses of quantitative data were conducted with appropriate tests of significance and reliability.  A thematic framework was developed for coding and analysis of qualitative data.

Results: In this paper we present key findings from the self report data and programme observation on the extent to which the SFP10-14 was delivered with fidelity.  Key influences on programme implementation are also discussed.  These included: group size; participants’ engagement with programme content; and facilitators’ management of tensions between adherence to the manual and social interactions.

Conclusions: Findings highlight the value of examining delivery quality as well as adherence, and the importance of understanding the relationship between group dynamics and programme fidelity.  Subsequent work will assess the relationship of fidelity to outcomes.  A key limitation has resulted from difficulties in involving families in research focus groups but this has been offset by triangulation of other data.


David Foxcroft
Alcohol industry: David Foxcroft’s institution has received financial support for the development of the SFP10-14(UK) programme materials from the alcohol industry.