Jeremy Segrott, PhD, 
Research Fellow in Public Health, DECIPHer Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			 
		
			
				Heather Rothwell, MSc, Research Associate, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				Simon Murphy, PhD, Reader, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				Sarah Morgan-Trimmer, PhD, Research Associate, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				Jonathan B. Scourfield, PhD, Professor, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				Jo C. Holliday, PhD, Research Fellow, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				Claire Thomas, MSc, Trial Manager, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				Zoe Roberts, PhD, Lecturer, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				David Gillespie, MSc, Statistician, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				Laurence Moore, PhD, Professor of Public Health Improvement, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				David Foxcroft, PhD, Professor of Community Psychology and Public Health, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				Kerry Hood, PhD, Director, South East Wales Trials Unit, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				Ceri Phillips, PhD, Professor of Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				Hayley Reed, BSc, Involving Young People Officer, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
			
		
			
				Ioan Humphries, MSc, Research Officer, Cardiff University, Swansea, United Kingdom
			
		
	
 
	
	
		Background: Fidelity evaluation is particularly important in pragmatic studies, which afford greater potential for variation than explanatory trials.  The Project SFP Cymru process evaluation has examined adherence, exposure, quality of delivery, participant engagement and programme differentiation during a randomised controlled trial of the Strengthening Families Programme (SFP10-14UK) involving more than 700 families.  SFP10-14UK was delivered by local voluntary and statutory bodies in seven areas of Wales.  Training, funding and programme manuals were provided as they would be in a non-research context and there were no special measures to control programme delivery.
Methods: Data collection comprised: thirty-three interviews with and self-report data from programme staff; observation of programme sessions; and routine data from each area.  Descriptive analyses of quantitative data were conducted with appropriate tests of significance and reliability.  A thematic framework was developed for coding and analysis of qualitative data.
Results: In this paper we present key findings from the self report data and programme observation on the extent to which the SFP10-14 was delivered with fidelity.  Key influences on programme implementation are also discussed.  These included: group size; participants’ engagement with programme content; and facilitators’ management of tensions between adherence to the manual and social interactions.
Conclusions: Findings highlight the value of examining delivery quality as well as adherence, and the importance of understanding the relationship between group dynamics and programme fidelity.  Subsequent work will assess the relationship of fidelity to outcomes.  A key limitation has resulted from difficulties in involving families in research focus groups but this has been offset by triangulation of other data.
	
 
	
	
		
			
			
				
	
		
			
			
				
	
		
			
			
				
	
		
			
			
				
	
		
			
			
				
	
		
			
			
				
	
		
			
			
				
	
		
			
			
				
	
		
			
			
				
	
		
			
			
				
	
		
			
			
				
				
David Foxcroft
				
				
						
						Alcohol industry: 
						David Foxcroft’s institution has received financial support for the development of the SFP10-14(UK) programme materials from the alcohol industry.