Methods. We used growth-mixture modeling to classify our sample of 592 low-income, African American adolescents into four multiple risk trajectories based on their reported behaviors in the areas of substance use, conduct problems, and sexual risk-taking during adolescence. One-way ANOVAs were then used to test whether classes were significantly different from each other on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (C-DISC) version 4.0, Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Youth Self-Report (YSR) outcomes.
Results. The “increasing high-risk takers” scored higher than the normative class on C-DISC conduct disorder (CD) symptom counts (M=6.86 vs. 4.91, p<.05), and on CBCL scores regarding conduct problems (M=6.24 vs. 3.78, p<.05), oppositional defiant disorder (M=4.14 vs. 2.93, p<.05), rule-breaking (M=6.35 vs. 3.97, p<.01) and aggressive behaviors (M=10.51 vs. 7.15, p<05) . The “early experimenters” had higher CDISC CD symptom counts (M=8.33 vs. 4.91, p<.001), CBCL conduct problems scores (M=6.67 vs. 3.78, p<.05), and YSR conduct problems (M=6.62 vs. 4.15, p<.05) and rule-breaking behaviors (M=7.23 vs. 4.42, p<.01) scores. The “adolescent-limited” group differed from the normative class only on their caregiver-reported CBCL rule-breaking behaviors score (M=6.77 vs. 3.97, p<.05).
Conclusions. Examining adolescents’ behaviors in sexual risk-taking, substance use and conduct problems may be helpful for identifying which adolescents may develop externalizing behavior disorders (versus normative engagement in risk behaviors) and designing appropriate interventions to prevent these behaviors